About 30 years ago, the decision was made

to undertake a massive vaccination program in the U.S. swine flu. It seemed a good idea at the time, but two things happened to throw in mass vaccination programs in a bad light. First, he waited for swine flu pandemic occurred.

Another problem – which proved to be far worse – is that (apparently) of contaminated vaccine triggered a serious neurological problem in several hundred people who were shot. This side effect is rare – about one case per 100,000 vaccinations. But the pandemic began, there was no advantage to take the vaccine, so that the side effects completely dominated column space in newspapers the next day. 1976 swine flu vaccine a lot of bad press. />
Currently can not mention on “swine flu vaccine on the Internet, without people jumping in with all sorts of conspiracy theories regarding vaccine companies and their intention to blanket the world, sure strokes of swine flu that will cause more harm than good dirt. />
Survive flu pandemic, Stephen Carter is a bit of risk management and shows us that if we assume that the swine flu virus is mild and causes no more than three deaths per 10,000 infectionsabout 10 times more likely to die from an adverse reaction because of a bad vaccine. />
I was surprised that number is only 10, but this is a pessimistic scenario, and that 'vaccines today are actually safer than vaccines contaminated with 1976, so that number could reach 100 . Then there is the possibility of a more lethal strain of swine influenza caused. If this happens, the number swells again.

If you want details, look survive flu pandemic. And “the only place I saw a realistic assessment of such risk:

http://393df5jc2h5c-wjfweaa3cvhvv.hop.clickbank.net/

FYI

Share →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>